Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

When Obama’s legal hatchet men and the Pelosi leadership in Congress want to investigate former President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, it is more perceived as a political vendetta rather than a real probe of alleged “crimes” committed against humanity. There is this legal maxim that any violation of law must be prosecuted, which makes a good excuse for running after them. But in the disquieted mind of majority of Americans, it is a political witch hunt that is not only counterproductive but dangerous. Since our homeland security and intelligence officers not to speak of the entire U.S. Armed Forces willfully participated in committing those alleged “war crimes” under their Commander-In-Chief, they too must be investigated and if found guilty hanged by the neck until dead, for in the mind of the Obama cult, it is the law that must applied. Does this make sense?
1 posted on 02/01/2009 10:30:58 PM PST by season_bug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: season_bug
Well, we have only had one in my life time that wouldn't have improved the nation by being hung - so why not just hang 'em all anyway after their term? Kinda like the Picts? /sarc
2 posted on 02/01/2009 10:42:34 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

For those lurkers who aren’t sure about this war crimes thing — I’ll help you out.

President Bush did not commit war crimes.
Vice-President Cheney did not commit war crimes.
Those who “perceive” that they did are today’s
STUCK ON STUPID winners.


3 posted on 02/01/2009 10:51:38 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

While I agree with the points attempted in this article outtake, I find the sentences needlessly long, and the language and grammar to be stilted and unwieldy in structure, lacking in clarity.

I am accustomed to reading writing which poses a genuine challenge - such as William F Buckley, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Leo Tolstoi...so it is not the density of ideas that perturbs.

I find it challenging to look at this as the work of a seasoned and award-winning journalist. I believe another pass at this subject could yield better results, and an argument that would render the subject matter accessible and understandable, not clouded and distant would benefit supporters of this POV.

A.A.C.


4 posted on 02/01/2009 11:01:22 PM PST by AmericanArchConservative (Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: season_bug

What does #8220 mean?


5 posted on 02/01/2009 11:07:06 PM PST by diamond6 (Is SIDS preventable? www.Stopsidsnow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson