To: tacticalogic
I would think you should address those thoughts to the authors of the article. They are complaining about others using the term Darwinism while using the term creationist. All I'm asking is that they don't do what they complain about.
Are evolutionists going to repudiate Darwinism? And if not Darwinism, What is a better term?
25 posted on
01/28/2009 1:40:50 PM PST by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
I would think you should address those thoughts to the authors of the article. I could, but how would I address the post?
Or you can pretend you're arguing with Richard Dawkins, and I can pretend I'm arguing with Fred Phelps, and it can turn into just another crevo bitchfest.
26 posted on
01/28/2009 1:47:01 PM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: count-your-change
Are evolutionists going to repudiate Darwinism? And if not Darwinism, What is a better term? Jay Gould said the "dirty little secret of paleontology is Darwin got it wrong". But getting the ToE establishment to agree is like pulling teeth. Won't happen. Because Darwin is a god to them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson