To: count-your-change
Are evolutionists going to repudiate Darwinism? And if not Darwinism, What is a better term? Jay Gould said the "dirty little secret of paleontology is Darwin got it wrong". But getting the ToE establishment to agree is like pulling teeth. Won't happen. Because Darwin is a god to them.
![](http://www.stephenjaygould.org/images/newsweekcover.jpg)
To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
Gould didn't think neo-Darwinism was the be all but he made it clear that evolution its self was not to be questioned whatever the actual means.
32 posted on
01/28/2009 2:21:01 PM PST by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
That's a very cool cover although its a bit odd the way he's holding that horn.
>>Jay Gould said the "dirty little secret of paleontology is Darwin got it wrong". But getting the ToE establishment to agree is like pulling teeth. Won't happen. Because Darwin is a god to them.<< I don't know if Professor Gould used those exact words but he did work on something called punctuated equilibrium that differed from Darwin's view. Gould felt that evolution moved in relatively faster bursts at times.
But there are lots things that Darwin didn't know or got wrong - this is yet another reason to use a term like developmental or evolutionary biology - "Darwinism" hasn't been a science since the 1930's.
883 posted on
01/30/2009 12:17:32 PM PST by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson