I do not have a blog site...
You people really are just children firing randomly in the dark... Amazing.
I am not wanting to start anything else here, but why is almost every new thread you post (at least recently) are all a “Canada Free Press” editorial by JB Williams?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2173546/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2172569/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2172017/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2168408/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2165984/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2164477/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2163903/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2162630/posts
or JB Williams from another source?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2163073/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2158672/posts
Should you disclose if you are related to JB Williams or just a fan? Scanning through these, it seems the mods have done a decent job organizing the editorial type entries to the blog category and keeping the news ones as news..
Stuff published on web and chat sites, and blog sites and individual web sites gets allocated to that category.
This site has been active for over a decade. Systems and conventions have developed and evolved based on broad usage habits of the membership.
Keep in mind that we started mainly as a forum exposing the corruption of the Clinton era and a national press that was spinning to support him. During that tracking it became apparent that certain journalists needed careful tracking and that certain media changed breaking news accounts to fit a political agenda. It therefore became very important to track the history of how national stories were written — all to track and stop the Clinon corruption.
To keep that channel clear, opinion comments, vanity postings and general chat had to be relegated to seperate sub-forums as there were solid contributing members that relentlessly tracked the media.
In recent years people have seen this site as a general activism bulletin board — something that wasn’t its original base in its growth. I know because eduacational and general conservative discussion is what always interested me the most as well. I learned however that it wasn’t my site, it was Jim’s and it would hold the character he desired. People that can’t deal with its character are welcomed to create or advance other websites. Its a healthy thing for the spread of conservative activism.
Just because it doesn’t seem to function as you might prefer doesn’t mean it is not functioning as other’s are comfortable with.
Without a change in this policy, I am through posting to FR.
Policy ain't changed, yet here you still are.