Ummm so by my pointing out to you that the majority of Freepers agree with Jim Robinson on creation, that the majority of people in general want creationism taught alongside evolution, (did you bother reading ANY of the links metmom and I posted that destroyed your argument???)means I claim to speak for the majority of freepers AND conservatives?
Well allll-righty-then!
Please point to the poll that shows that a majority of all 100,000+ Freepers are creationists. Even if that's true, so what?.
...that the majority of people in general want creationism taught alongside evolution,
40% of Americans believe in astrology. I would oppose that being taught as science as well.
means I claim to speak for the majority of freepers AND conservatives?
Like I said, you don't speak for anybody. You're a follower and you cling on to other Freepers whose knowledge of the subject far exceeds yours. After they've made their points, you chime in with a link you got off Google and your proverbial "stupid evo-cultist!" ad hominem.