Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 1234; 50mm; 6SJ7; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; aristotleman; af_vet_rr; Aggie Mama; ...
Psystar's amusing legal theories... again. PING!


Mac v. Psystar Ping!

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 01/14/2009 8:53:41 PM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

Isn’t this no different than a system builder purchasing Windows licenses to install on the systems they sell?

Does building and selling a computer with the MAC OS on it violate Apple’s license agreement for MACS? I’m not familiar with the case, but this seems a bit harsh.


4 posted on 01/14/2009 9:03:19 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Its been a long, long time since I visited antitrust issues, and the only antitrust academic class I took was in undergrad economics, not law school. But I’ve read up a little on this after reading this post, and I tend to agree with you: their claims are probably without merit.

The interesting thing, though, is that Apple will most likely argue that some of the elements of tying arrangements don’t apply here because the restraint of trade isn’t significant when Apple to “ties” the OS to their machines since Apple doesn’t have a significant market share. Pretty ironic considering how their marketing department is trying to position them.


5 posted on 01/14/2009 9:03:43 PM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson