Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ed Hale got the divorcee decree of Dunham vs Obama Sr.
Plains Radio ^ | 1/2/09 | Patriot08

Posted on 01/02/2009 1:16:10 PM PST by patriot08

Ed Hale of Plains Radio has secured a copy of the Dunham/Obama divorce decree as promised. He has registered this at the courthouse and has turned the document over to lawyers who are reported to be happy and enthused over the contents.

This is the first page. This is all that can be divulged at this time as those who have seen the decree are sworn to silence. You may hear information about it tonight on Ed's plainsradio show.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: anyminute; bho2008; birthcertificate; birthplace; certifigate; divorce; dunham; obama; obamafamily; obamatruthfile; realsoonnow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,941-1,945 next last
To: patriot08

Somebody (or a lot of somebodys) will be watching that POE for just such an occurrence.


861 posted on 01/02/2009 7:40:12 PM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...

Ping to summary and interesting (short) comments at links shown in #845:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2157797/posts?page=845#845


862 posted on 01/02/2009 7:40:14 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 845 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

You can be sure that Obama spent hours reviewing video tapes of Malcom X in order to duplicate his vocal patterns and mannerisms. Obama sounds like X, not the other way around. In fact, Obama is a poor imitation. X was actually eloquent. Obama is uh, uh, uh, uh, uh -— let me clear -— an empty suit.


863 posted on 01/02/2009 7:40:55 PM PST by erkyl (The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in a period of moral crisis, stay neutral)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Tired of being baited.

I agree.

864 posted on 01/02/2009 7:41:02 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Join the Constitution Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freepersup

Well, help us out! Where is the key and why do we have to play Sherlock Holmes for it?


865 posted on 01/02/2009 7:42:02 PM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 814 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe; patriot08

866 posted on 01/02/2009 7:42:18 PM PST by STARWISE ((They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Yeah, I’m with you, it sure would be easier for everyone if Obama would remove the justifiable cloud over his head by releasing the documents proving he was born in the US.


867 posted on 01/02/2009 7:43:10 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 833 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

You said — “So then you are ducking my question:”

Saying I don’t know how many Supreme Court cases is not ducking your question — it’s answering it directly and truthfully... LOL..

And then you said — “You are trying to make it seem that if Arthur got away with being a fraud and that there is no apparent harm that was done that then we all can rest easy knowing that in this case it will be exactly the same. It is no going to be exactly the same though.”

It does seem very clear that Arthur got away with fraud, no question about it. Or..., at least that was the allegation (or was it the truth?). Well, anyway... he got away with fraud...

I didn’t say that no apparent harm was done — I was wondering what was the harm that was done. Perhaps someone can outline that harm for me, so I would know. That would be a good indicator of what is going to happen here. Please, let me know the harm...

I’m not saying rest easy — but there is one thing to say — the Constitution *still* has the same provisions for the requirements for the Office of President of the United States — even though President Arthur was not qualified.

I think that would allay some people’s fears that the Constitutional requirements would somehow disappear...


868 posted on 01/02/2009 7:43:21 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

>how many pieces of legislation were invalidated during Chester A. Arthur’s term in office, because he was not a legitimate President?<

And what does that prove? I say nothing.

The historical case of Arthur does not prove that there is no harm in ignoring the requirements of the Constitution for eligibility.

These are much different times and this case may have already gotten hotter than the case against Arthur ever did (not sure but would venture that it has).


869 posted on 01/02/2009 7:43:30 PM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret
Before you reply to this please note that I'm against Obama being president because he is not a natural born citizen..

If you go to factcheck.org it states his father Obama Sr. was a Kenyan citizen and Obama also admits he was born under dual citizenship.

So the Obama Dunham divorce certificate does not bring anything new in the equation.

870 posted on 01/02/2009 7:44:00 PM PST by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 840 | View Replies]

To: XenaLee

The Mormons or http://familysearch.org is the worst source for recent additions! When I began searching this back in July I went there and the info they had for the Dunhams seemed somewhat “hinky”. I noticed the name who had submitted the info and googled his name. It turned out to be an architect in Chicago so I asked my Mormon neighbor who could submit info for their website and she told me anyone could. The only info I trust which I find there is when the link goes to something like the SSDeath index.


871 posted on 01/02/2009 7:44:27 PM PST by Chief Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies]

To: jarofants
Who is Scott Dunham?

Who is John Galt?

872 posted on 01/02/2009 7:44:50 PM PST by null and void (Petroglyphs. The original cliffs notes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 841 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Saying I don’t know how many Supreme Court cases is not ducking your question — it’s answering it directly and truthfully... LOL..”

Sorry but I hadnt caught up to that answer yet, I was still on you last response.


873 posted on 01/02/2009 7:45:17 PM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

There are 326 ports of entry in the US and Ed Hale’s not going to tell us at which one he found the registered birth certificate.


874 posted on 01/02/2009 7:45:22 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Who the Hale is Ed?


875 posted on 01/02/2009 7:45:42 PM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies]

To: tyke

Someone pointed out that he sounded like this character called Bugs who called in to the Art Bell show claiming to have shot Bigfoot.

And by God, I’d swear it was the same person. Listen and tell me what you think.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOBggD7iiFY&mode=related&search


876 posted on 01/02/2009 7:45:58 PM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
And so, when we look to history — do we see that all these *problems* (which posters say will happen with a foreign born President) — did they happen with Arthur? I’m wondering what happen to that Constitutional provision for Natural Born in the Constitution — after — Arthur was President? Was it trashed?

The People didn't vote for Arthur -- they voted for Garfield.

When Arthur ran on his on right, he didn't even win the primary. That should answer your questions.

-PJ

877 posted on 01/02/2009 7:46:44 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

You said — “And what does that prove? I say nothing.”

Well, then I guess you don’t want to know the answer to that question. However, I would still like to know the answer to that question of how many pieces of legislation was invalidated during Chester A. Arthur’s term in office. That would give me some indication from history as to what we’ll be facing...

And then you said — “The historical case of Arthur does not prove that there is no harm in ignoring the requirements of the Constitution for eligibility.”

Well, I would like to know from history, what effect it had on the Constitutional provisions for President of the United States and if the present-day qualifications were changed by that episode of Arthur not being qualified. That’s something that I would like to know... Has it changed from that time?

And finally you said — “These are much different times and this case may have already gotten hotter than the case against Arthur ever did (not sure but would venture that it has).”

It sure is “hot” in certain quarters — but it’s certainly a total “non-starter” in other quarters. I guess it depends on what place you’re looking at it from...


878 posted on 01/02/2009 7:47:12 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 869 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Thanks for the ping unspun. No way can I read through all that so I’ll wait for the facts to be posted here on the thread.


879 posted on 01/02/2009 7:47:14 PM PST by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 847 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
On the President-elect and Chester Arthur. Your statement.

And it seems,that it's going to be in both cases, that no one is going to come up with proof.

Doubters of Chester Arthur at his time and place are long gone, of course. As to the present case, they are going to hang on like a wire haired terrier clamped onto someones posterior. I am with 'em.

Hope you have a sense of humour.

880 posted on 01/02/2009 7:47:16 PM PST by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,941-1,945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson