Posted on 01/02/2009 1:16:10 PM PST by patriot08
Ed Hale of Plains Radio has secured a copy of the Dunham/Obama divorce decree as promised. He has registered this at the courthouse and has turned the document over to lawyers who are reported to be happy and enthused over the contents.
This is the first page. This is all that can be divulged at this time as those who have seen the decree are sworn to silence. You may hear information about it tonight on Ed's plainsradio show.
I got sidetracked this is sick-O...I wish I didnt know this.
Name: Renee L Abena Obama
Birth Date: 31 October 2004 (Historical Events)
Death Date: 25 December 2004 (Historical Events)
Issuing State: Maryland
SSN: 215-71-0752
See Neighbors
Did you see the last names of the neighbors... and some live in other states I dont understand that...
Results 1 - 25 of 6,940,719 for (2004 Or 2005 Or 2003) Next Next
Given Name Surname Birth Year Death Year County State More Details
Vincent I 1916 2004 Santa Clara California More Details
Vicki L 1956 2004 Saint Lucie Florida More Details
Alden O 2004 2005 More Details
Keum O 1931 2004 Baltimore Maryland More Details
Sung Kil O 1916 2004 Los Angeles California More Details
Yong O 1933 2004 Pinellas Florida More Details
Kai Yan U 1914 2004 Los Angeles California More Details
Mario X 1971 2004 More Details
Terry X 1947 2004 Wayne Michigan More Details
Noh Y 1962 2004 More Details
Louis 0Rsini 1954 2004 Gloucester New Jersey More Details
William 3Ession 1980 2004 More Details
Khamphong 8Soudaly 1940 2004 More Details
http://www.worldvitalrecords.com/zsearch.aspx?ix=ssdiall&qt=l&zdate=2004+OR+2005+OR+2003&zrzip=
I knew Stanley Ann was cremated like her mother. Another poster (upthread) found Stanley Ann’s date of death via her social security records.
The lawn comment from Maya is very strange.
Why did Stanley Ann have all those aliases? This is a very secretive family, and really did live on the fringe of what was considered “normal” in those days. Not your typical family from Kansas.
Could be they were being "watched" by the FBI as communists or fellow travelers and didn't want to put their address in a public forum.
...and I gave you one.
You're hanging your hat on a Supreme Court ruling, and I'm suggesting that public opinion, beyond extortionist threats to burn down your business if you don't pay for "protection," (i.e. predictions of riots in the streets if Obama is disqualified) can also be an influencer.
That's why the MSM isn't covering this, for fear of building up public opinion of any kind.
-PJ
So you then obviously do not think that this is very serious then since you are trying to make the point that it hurt nothing by Arthur possibly being ineligible. Your objective is obviously to make it seem that it wont hurt anyting if Obama gets away with it.
This is all showing how you think on these issues and what agenda you hold, imo.
You even made a point of acting as if you believed someone might be an abortion bomber if they dont accept a Supreme Court decision. I really think now that you are really a liberal on here trying to influence this issue for Obama’s favor or something.
You said — “Just one little thing, for a certified copy of the Original Birth Certificate, that the state of Hawaii says they have, to be provided directly to one, just one, of the Courts which have active cases seeking it’s production. That would either make the issue go away, or blow it wide open.”
Well, Berg was saying that it couldn’t be compelled and that’s the problem. If that’s the system you have at the present (and Berg says it is) — and you’re unable to get it — then you’ve got a real big problem. And if the courts won’t compel it, then there’s not much more that one can do.
—
You then said — “BHO has not seen fit to request such a BC be provided. Why has he not done so? And instead sent lawyers to argue against “standing” and any requirement to provide the BC. However much they might have cost him it would be much much more than it would cost ($12 if done over the ‘net) to have one provided to such a court directly from the State of Hawaii’s Department of Health Statistics.”
I know the arguments about providing the info to settle the accusations against him — as I used the same ones before the election... :-)
The problem that is at issue — is not what can be done to satisfy accusations that we see here (and elsewhere) — that’s not the real issue at hand. The real issue at hand is — rather — can one be “compelled” to show this documentation, or even further — can just one particular candidate be compelled to show this documentation and not others be compelled to show it. That’s what the courts are going to be looking at.
Now *after* they decide whether one can be compelled to show this documentation — then we’ll know whether we’ll get it or not. We will if they say it can be compelled. We won’t get it if they say it cannot be compelled.
Now, from what Berg has said — it appears to me that the courts are going to say it can’t be compelled under the laws that we have in place right now. So, that’s going to lead to a legislative solution to correct those laws.
Telephone book? Look up the owner's name. If they show at that address, they probably lived there. But you'd have a hard time finding who did live there...unless you had a specific name in mind and looked them up in the phone book and they showed up at that address.
But the location would have been much too expensive for a knocked up freshman and her foreign student husband.
You’re wasting your breath. I went round and round with Star Traveler yesterday because he kept saying he wasn’t putting faith in something not “verified” regarding Obama’s dual citizenship. After about 10 posts of saying “It’s not about verifying anything, it’s a fact he was born a British subject” I gave up.
in coming fr mail
I must’ve missed something. Why are people assuming that a direct flight from London to Vancouver existed back in 1961, especially if that flight had to stop and refuel in Nowheresville, Newfoundland? If she was going from London to Seattle, wouldn’t it be more likely that there was a transfer (or 2 or 3)? Based on the Harvard connection, I’d assume Logan (if that was open in 1961). If not that, NYC.
Yeah, I read someone elses post who said it was Aug 8. Too bad. It’s a document, though, and the D. might be of use.
They had photo copiers, as opposed to Xerox style copiers. They actually took a picture of the thing to be copied, and then made a print. Nasty things. I have one of my marriage license (1970 document, got the copy in the '80s) I can barely read it. But I have copies of my DD-214 (discharge) made in '73 that are quite readable, if getting a bit yellow. In fact I used one of them as demonstration of veteran status when I renewed my CHL a couple of months ago. (and thus got it for half price :) ). Although they never really asked for it, and likely it would have shown up on the background check anyway.
No, I think it was serious with President Arthur, just as serious as the issue is with Obama. They are both equally serious under the Constitution...
And no..., I don’t think that I’m accusing someone of being an abortion clinic bomber. I said that being that kind of “bomber” — is not the way to reject the court’s decision for abortion.
I’ll reprint the wording here —
So, when you say “reject” it — the question is are you going to reject it by blowing up abortion clinics with bombs? Or are you going to reject it by shooting abortion doctors dead? If so, that’s not the kind of rejection that I would be talking about.
That’s explaining the way to *not* reject the court’s decision.
However, on the other hand, if you’re saying that there exists no people who respond in that way — then no, that’s not correct. There are definitely some (a very few) who do respond that way in that particular situation of the Supreme Court’s decision. Fortunately they are very few.
Oh, and saying that one is a liberal... well, I did take the liberal/conservative test... :-)
You can see the results on my home page... if you want.
I had seen that info quite awhile ago and people tried to relate it to Obama Sr or Jr or Ann but I doubt it is anything about any of that family. Say Good Night Gracie! Tomorrow is soon enough for more of this, my couch is developing a permanent slump in it after spending all night on this thread!
There’s still no justification for a Second American Revolution if the court decision doesn’t go according to one’s opinion, no matter what. I’ll keep within the system and make necessary changes that way and deal with Supreme Court decisions as they decide. There will be no revolutions here, with me... :-)
It’s a technique promoted by Axelrod, called axelturf that keep people from doing the job at hand. Changing the subject...Taking over the thread.
The job at hand is finding the Port entry of Stanley Ann D Obama and infant son. You are welcome to join those of us who freep mail each other with information....Keeps certain people from knowing what’s REALLY happening.
We are trying to locate a listing of people entering through ports after 1959 Several before. Was given a hint through freepmail of Baltimore.
Oh, and saying that one is a liberal... well, I did take the liberal/conservative test... :-)
You can see the results on my home page... if you want.
Ok that proves it, now go to bed. As if any poser couldn’t set that up. Do you think people are stupid? You are so transparent.
Yes ma'am, you are absolutely correct. It's best to ignore them completely
Say Good Night Gracie!
LOL sweet dreams!
You said — “I think what most here believe is that the Supreme Court is capable of making an error.”
The Supreme Court made an error in the Dred Scott decision. That was corrected. The Supreme Court made an error in the Roe v. Wade decision. That has not been corrected.
So, it’s apparent that they can make errors — but we abide by the decisions and we make corrections from within the system. Sometimes that takes a while, as it has in the past. But we always stay with their decisions in the meantime...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.