There are a lot of women who go lesbian and then switch back. We call them “bisexual”, mostly because otherwise we would have to admit that gayness is a lifestyle choice, not hereditary, at least in women.
People are attracted to a subset of the population. The concept that they must only be attracted to people of one sexuality or another is absurd, especially when you consider that if you dress a man up like a woman, and make them attractive enough, you can get another man to want to have sex with them.
If gayness was hereditary and based on some actual physical nature, heterosexuals wouldn’t be attracted to same-sex people who simply dressed opposite.
“If gayness was hereditary and based on some actual physical nature, heterosexuals wouldn’t be attracted to same-sex people who simply dressed opposite.”
Not sure I understand the logic here. Once most heterosexuals find out that it’s “tranny surprise” time, they get the heck out of there. How is the fact that some men can’t tell a woman from a man in drag at a distance or in a dimly lit setting proof of much of anything?
I know several women who went lesbo for awhile because of bad relationships with men, but eventually went back to being hetero, which is their true nature.
You've probably heard the term before, but some in college call themselves LUGs (Lesbian Until Graduation).
If gayness was hereditary and based on some actual physical nature, heterosexuals wouldn’t be attracted to same-sex people who simply dressed opposite.
Hmm. Not sure what you mean here.