> Autonomic kook response. The burden of proof is on those who make the claims of ghosts and fairies and little green men.
No, *that* is an automatic kook response. You’ve got a perfectly-good photo of a UFO over Suffolk Cathedral: the onus of proof is on you: if not an alien vessel from outer space, what is it?
Autonomic kook response number 2.
It may be a perfectly good photo to you, but otherwise it means nothing. And anyway, how can you make such a pronouncement when the headline says possible photo emerges?
Here's another "perfectly good photo of a UFO". Other than the fact I present it here, it proves nothing, it advances no cause.
First thing that struck me when I saw the image was "cloud formation"? Now that could be because of my previous view of this thread. Point is, one's opinion of an inconclusive image can generate all sorts of conclusions.
Note, obviously the image in the photo on this thread and the photo from the "hole" thread aren't the same. My point is that clouds can sometimes take strange forms, and, the more I look at the photo from this thread, the more it looks like a cloud to me (a strange cloud yes, but we know clouds can form strange forms from the previous thread, so it doesn't seem that unreasonable to conclude it's a cloud, IMO).