Pardon me if you already know this and are both informed and annoyed, but if not, and for others...
“dugg” is the same thing as a “bump” except it also conveys that the article was “dugg” by me when I went to the Digg site and clicked after logging in initially to Digg.
“Digg” exposes influential articles FAR more to the general public reading articles through the Digg site. It also sets an example for others to occasionally type that. I do not do it all the time.
You are going to see it more, especially right now when FR is experimenting with it as a method for increasing exposure.
We probably should have been doing it a long time ago. Annoying to have to but we are in a war right now.
In this case, Florida is important, and Cuba stealing a free child from here while the clintonistas/new obamians were in charge might remind some folks there that smart Americans don’t vote for democrats.
My problem is that the article isn’t posted HERE, where it’s convenient to read. How about a bit of courtesy to post the article if you’re going to make a thread about it and allow THE VIEWER the OPTION to Digg it themselves? Just my opinion, but I think it’s getting obnoxious.
No content, no source link, just a title and a plea with a link to Digg it.
Well, now that it's been posted, any subsequent attempts to post the same article will show in a search that it's already been posted.
But it really hasn't been posted on FR has it?
The only thing posted on FR is a dumb ass link to Digg it.
Any historical record on FR is lost.