No. I don’t quite think so.
From my perspective . . .
it APPEARS EMPHATICALLY that you lean sooooooooo far away from a TYPE I ERROR that you VIRTUALLY INSURE a TYPE II ERROR.
That’s not scientific nor logical, to me.
Even as a shrink, I have a hard time explaining that behavior. However, I remain quite curious about it.
I don’t think water is a problem but supposedly ammonia is quite deadly to greys.
Yeah, I think the Biblical prediction of ‘men’s hearts failing them for fear’ will, in part, eventually have something to do with such phenomena/events.
I don’t think much of naysayers and peer reviewed journals. The peer reviewed high quality truly scientific agricultural journal reviewing a crop circle crop analysis couple of articles or 3 was
VERY IRRATIONALLY dissed hereon. VERY IRRATIONALLY. Shocked even naysayer hardened moi. I was aghast at the ignorance and utterly clueless diatribes in response. They would NOT DEAL WITH the evidence. Pure irrational biased hostility beginning to end.
Anyway—off to church.
Blessings,