Uhhhh . . . the
Type I VS Type II error stuff is more or less regardless of particulars.
On average . . . WHEN one leans tooooooo far away from one, the AUTOMATIC RESULT IS virtually insuring the other kind of error.
Sure there are exceptions . . . however, on average, that turns out to be the case.
Sounds like your response to the . . . realities . . . whatever those ‘OBJECTIVELY’ are . . . was based as much on emotion [disappointment etc. that whatever didn’t match whatever criteria, standard you’d decided was essential] as on the evidence.
The result seems to be now, that short of a UFO in your lap castrating you, there’s no evidence you’d fairly consider. That’s leaning way over the cliff of the Grand Canyon begging for a TYPE II error.
Seems kind of silly and sad, from my perspective. And all the more so given the stuff coming out of the woodwork . . . UK and French files released . . . Old timers going on record the closer they get to graduating from this life . . . etc. None of that will be equal to a UFO in your lap castrating you—by fiat—by definition—by arbitrary TYPE II ERROR BEGGING decision.
A LOT of that is high quality evidence quite sufficient—quality-wise, normally, to convict murders and sentence them to execution. But noooooooooooooooo, You’d rather BEG for a TYPE II ERROR than be disappointed . . . than what . . . feel foolish? ever again.
Very sad, to me.
I hope there’s no other area in your life—no relationships where similar vengeance, bitterness or whatever has such an influence in your attitudes and behaviors.