[r9etb]

If you use false statements objectivity falls out of the question.

The word was "objective," as in, "involving or deriving from sense perception or experience with actual objects, conditions, or phenomena."

Whether or not Biden's "facts" were honest, he probably succeeded in making a lot of people think they were honest, which in politics is most of the battle.

[FreeReign]

Whether or not Biden's "facts" were honest, he probably succeeded in making a lot of people think they were honest, which in politics is most of the battle.

Ironically for Biden, I think the brain dead undecideds when more for Sarah's style than they did for Biden's well presented, lies.

[arasina]

Whether or not Biden's "facts" were honest, he probably succeeded in making a lot of people think they were honest, which in politics is most of the battle.

Key word: probably. My take: Unlikely. People are sick to death of smarmy, elitist politicians who believe they can tell us what we think and how we feel. Joe Biden even had a few moments of smug "buddy-buddy" looks toward Gwen Ifil, as if to say, "Sarah's just a dumb little girl. You and I, we know better." If you watched the Luntz group's reaction segment, you have to know they represent a portion of the voting population who really, really liked what Sarah had to say.

[blackbart.223]

"Whether or not Biden's "facts" were honest, he probably succeeded in making a lot of people think they were honest, which in politics is most of the battle."

To make short, Lies are in order.

[blackbart.223]

"Whether or not Biden's "facts" were honest, he probably succeeded in making a lot of people think they were honest, which in politics is most of the battle."

There the problem is. Biden, Hitler and Obama know that if you repeat a lie long enough it appears to be the Truth.