Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia to deploy new nuclear missile

Posted on 10/02/2008 10:23:58 AM PDT by jack cass

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia hopes to deploy a new nuclear missile next year designed to penetrate anti-missile defenses and will build eight submarines to carry it, defense officials said on Thursday. ADVERTISEMENT

The latest statements underline Moscow's determination to upgrade its nuclear strike forces on land, sea and air. They are regarded by Russian commanders as the cornerstone of the country's defenses.

Colonel-General Vladimir Popovkin, head of armaments for the Russian armed forces, told the Defense Ministry newspaper "Red Star" that Russia's recent war with Georgia "compels us to rethink the current state of the armed forces and how they should develop further."

President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin have both pledged to extend Russia's recent military build-up with extra funds to buy new, high-tech arms. On Wednesday, Putin announced an extra $3.1 billion of spending next year, partly to replace equipment lost in the Georgia war.

Despite the billions of dollars spent on them since Putin came to power as president in 2000, Russia's 1 million-strong armed forces remain poorly equipped, badly paid and reliant on a large proportion of unwilling conscripts.

The deputy commander in chief of the Russian navy, Admiral Alexander Tatarinov, said on Thursday that by 2015 Moscow would build a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines to carry a new, nuclear-capable strategic missile.

"The navy has gone over to building ships and nuclear submarines by the batch," Tatarinov told Interfax news agency.

"A new state armaments program includes a plan to build a batch of eight nuclear submarines that would be armed with new Bulava strategic missiles."

SPENDING

Defense analysts based in Moscow say much of the extra spending has not reached the front line because of corruption or mismanagement and many weapons programs are running late.

One of these is the Bulava, a submarine-launched long-range nuclear missile which Putin says will be capable of penetrating any missile defenses -- a reference to Washington's plans for a new global system to shoot down hostile rockets.

The Bulava, a modified version of the land-based Topol-M, has had a checkered history with several test launch failures and is running at least two years late.

The navy pronounced the latest Bulava exercise on September 18 a success, saying the missile flew from the White Sea across Russia to the Far East.

Popovkin, who is also deputy defense minister, said he hoped the armed forces would accept the Bulava for service next year. Upgrading Russia's strategic nuclear forces remained a priority because they were the cornerstone of its defenses, he said.

"As long as we are a nuclear power, no hotheads will venture to attack our country," Popovkin said in the interview.

" ... We have already this year started fitting out strategic nuclear forces with the Topol-M missile," he added.

Russia also plans to modernize its nuclear-capable Tupolev TU-160 supersonic strategic bombers and to fully commission the first nuclear-powered submarine to carry the Bulava missile, he added.

The submarine, the Yuri Dolgoruky, was launched in February, six years after its original scheduled date, though it still lacks the missiles it was designed to carry.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/02/2008 10:23:58 AM PDT by jack cass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jack cass

Is “mutual Assured Destruction” with the Russkies still in place?


2 posted on 10/02/2008 10:25:38 AM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jack cass
Once Obama is President, with his commitment to unilaterally disarm our nuclear arsenal, the Soviets will change their minds and fix their roads and bridges instead.
3 posted on 10/02/2008 10:33:07 AM PDT by dartuser ("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jack cass

We’ll still be able to track their boats half way around the world.


4 posted on 10/02/2008 10:39:39 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
We’ll still be able to track their boats half way around the world.

Yeah, but it's the other half that worries me. ba-dump-dump.

To be series, it is cold comfort to know we'll be able to take out the platform after it has launched.

5 posted on 10/02/2008 10:53:14 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (don't worry, they only want to take water out of the other guy's side of the bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Knowing where it is prior to launch, and having sub killers on it’s butt in the event things get bad, is a warm comfort. They would be gone as the doors were opening.


6 posted on 10/02/2008 10:59:08 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Problem is, would the Reds sell these new missiles to people that do not like us very much?


7 posted on 10/02/2008 11:04:21 AM PDT by jack cass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

Ya first on Obamas list is peace talks with the Reds. I am sure Obama will trust Putin. Then Obama can come back and use a slick willy line, “there is not one Soviet missile point at the US” Gee only take a couple seconds to move em


8 posted on 10/02/2008 11:04:21 AM PDT by jack cass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jack cass
It will take the Russians 20 years to build and deploy 8 new submarines, each carrying missiles embedded with 20+-year-old technology. I'm not going to lose any sleep over this announcement.
9 posted on 10/02/2008 12:50:40 PM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jack cass

bump


10 posted on 11/10/2010 8:38:11 PM PST by Ivan the Terrible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson