Fights back against what? I guess they will have to throw out Newton (who wrote more theology than science), Kepler, and a host of others who were all theists!
Superstition
Yeah, it always amuses me that the evolutionists are the ones who get the most defensive. They conveniently ignore the scientific method when it doesn’t satisfy their agenda.
And replace with what?
Fights back against what? I guess they will have to throw out Newton (who wrote more theology than science), Kepler, and a host of others who were all theists!
Obviously itself!
The science coalition supports that language change because it says talking of “weaknesses” of evolution allows for religion-based concepts like creationism and intelligent design to enter the instruction. The Texas Freedom Network, an Austin-based group that says it monitors the influence of the religious right, also praises the proposed language change.
As we see these paranoid loons could care less about the science, any dissent is always automatically labeled religious in nature.
What other theory has to stomp out words such as “weakness” needing stickers on textbooks to remind students of it’s cultish phobias?
Once upon a time students were taught that theory was exactly that...theory and as such was treated as though questions about it were welcome, in that this would only add to the body of scientific knowledge.
Not so today with the cult of evolution as we see in NEA run failed schools.