Skip to comments.
Chinese Say They're Building 'Impossible' Space Drive
Wired
| 24 Sep 2008
Posted on 09/24/2008 9:44:37 AM PDT by Fractal Trader
(wired) Link Only:
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/09/chinese-buildin.html
TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Science; UFO's; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: alcubierre; antigravity; china; electrogravitics; electromagneticdrive; emdrive; eugenepodkletnov; eugenepodlekov; miguelalcubierre; nasa; rogershawyer; space; stringtheory; superluminal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: Ax
We really need to drop the barack and obama, and use only HUSSEIN..
21
posted on
09/24/2008 11:42:14 AM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Hussein, produce the REAL Birth Certificate!)
To: stylin_geek
Heck, whats an Earth or two when a new galactic freeway needs to be built.... "Why?! It's a bypass Mr. Dent. You've GOT to build bypasses."
22
posted on
09/24/2008 11:46:07 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Great spirits will always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.)
To: steve86
Perhaps you’re right, and perhaps Mr. Costella is right ... but just the tone of Mr. Costella’s rant makes me hope you’re both wrong. ;-)
23
posted on
09/24/2008 11:56:32 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: r9etb
I was just remarking on that one aspect — Costella’s concern may turn out to be misplaced. I haven’t formed any opinion of the relativistic physics — not quite sophisticated enough to do that, at least not without a solid weekend of cramming which I’m not going to do — but I would say the viability is unlikely for any useful thruster within our lifetimes even if the claims are true. Costella’s most useful contribution from my point of view may be his observation that relativity doesn’t impact the conservation of momentum IIRC.
24
posted on
09/24/2008 12:03:45 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Heh.
Galactic renewal, doncha know.....
25
posted on
09/24/2008 12:13:24 PM PDT
by
stylin_geek
(Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
To: Fractal Trader
Sounds like they’ve been doing their homework on electrogravitics.
26
posted on
09/24/2008 2:34:18 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery. http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/certifigate/index?tab=articles)
To: steve86
Particles bouncing off a surface, even at a shallow angle, impart a force perpendicular to the surface, not at the angle of the incoming particle (my summary). I had to think about that, as it is counter-intuitive unless you think it through, but sure enough, that objection is valid. The change in the particles direction uses up the rest of the momentum (approximate statement). It took me many Saturday afternoons in a dark pool hall and a few forfeited dollars before I fully appreciated that concept.
27
posted on
09/24/2008 2:47:13 PM PDT
by
VRWCtaz
((Two Senator Lawyers verses a Senator Naval Aviator and a Governor Hockey Mom - You decide.))
To: KevinDavis; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; Las Vegas Dave; ...
NCC 1701 ping. Cue the Jerry Goldsmith.
28
posted on
09/24/2008 4:37:46 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
To: Fractal Trader
To: LibWhacker
They’re not interested in my time machine though. I can prove it by going right on into tomorrow, in, oh, about three hours and forty-three minutes.
30
posted on
09/24/2008 5:17:44 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: markman46; AntiKev; wastedyears; ALOHA RONNIE; RightWhale; anymouse; Brett66; SunkenCiv; ...
Does anybody know where I could get a good Browncoat???
31
posted on
09/24/2008 6:57:46 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(McCain/Palin 08 Palin/Jindal 12)
To: xp38
32
posted on
09/24/2008 8:35:55 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Now sadly living in the DPRNYC [Brooklyn])
To: VRWCtaz
Hadn’t thought about that application, not being a billiard player. So it really works, eh?
33
posted on
09/24/2008 8:36:24 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
To: stylin_geek
Call me old fashioned, but I loved Asimov’s ‘Foundation’ and ‘Robot’ series, as well as Heinlein’s ‘Fuiture History’.
To: dead
To: Fractal Trader
from the article.................
What will China do with the technology? It may be relevant that professor Yang is not unknown in military circles, having published a paper called “Plasma Attack Against Low-Orbit Spy Satellites.”
Meanwhile, what about the American interest? Shawyer told me that “the flight thruster program is on hold for the present. [O]nce the U.K. government had provided an export license for a U.S. military application, the major U.S. aerospace company we had been dealing with stopped talking to us. “
The company may have decided that the Emdrive could not work. If they’re wrong, China has at least a year’s head start in a technology that will dominate space and make previous satellites as obsolete as sailing ships in the age of steam.
36
posted on
09/25/2008 2:20:22 PM PDT
by
ckilmer
(Phi)
To: Fractal Trader
37
posted on
09/30/2008 6:39:40 PM PDT
by
Dajjal
(Visit Ann Coulter's getdrunkandvote4mccain.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson