Sorry, you’re the one “fraudulently representing” my posts as saying any fossil find as “one tooth” or “fraud”.
I simply asked if they did it AGAIN in this case. That’s it.
Must be an oversensitive bit on your part, knowing that evos NEED, yes NEED, fraud to support their case.
It is you who thinks that Science needs fraud to support its case, and yet the two cases you source actually DETRACT from the evolutionary evidence of human descent out of Africa. Neither was “needed”, and either finding, if authentic, would go against all other evidence of human evolution out of Africa.
You however NEED to think that all evidence that goes against your presuppositions are fraudulent, and therefore invent wild eyed conspiracy theories about what Scientists are engaged in.