Thanks Razzle,
I agree that it’s much easier to point out the ridiculousness of Darwinism. The Biblical points were brought for a second reason, though, proof of the Divine. The funny thing is that the first column had nothing to do with evolution. I specifically stated in it that I wasn’t getting involved in a discussion on evolution b/c everything in the column holds true whether one believes in evolution or not. All it was about were logical proofs for Divine existence.
That was lost on them (I think purposely, though perhaps b/c they’re so caught up in the religion of darwinism, unlike Darwin, who was not). So I followed up with another column on the science, which does challenge evolution.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/3550
Abiogenesis is in fact an impossibility. But the biggest problem evolutionists have are the lack of real transitional fossils. We have a plethora of ape fossils (supposedly the early stages, according to evolutionists) and a plethora of human fossils (supposedly the latter stages) but nothing in between. That should be quite telling, or what happened to all those middle generations supposedly spanning tens of thousands of years (seeing that we have what supposedly came before them)?
It’s also interesting how the main evolutionist on this thread has to bring up a thousand irrelevant points, make challenges regarding factual statements like “chemistry and biology are two different fields of study,” etc.
Anyway, for a recent debate on the issues, in which it’s clear that most evolutionists know little about evolution, feel free to see a rough transcript of an entire debate.
http://creationistsearcher.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/yomin-postelnik-debates-with-atheists