If you will be kind enough to point out the abrupt break between human and ape in these specimens. But be aware that different creationist websites draw the line in different places.
Abiogenesis is in fact an impossibility. But the biggest problem evolutionists have are the lack of real transitional fossils. We have a plethora of ape fossils (supposedly the early stages, according to evolutionists) and a plethora of human fossils (supposedly the latter stages) but nothing in between. That should be quite telling, or what happened to all those middle generations supposedly spanning tens of thousands of years (seeing that we have what supposedly came before them)?
It’s also interesting how the main evolutionist on this thread has to bring up a thousand irrelevant points, make challenges regarding factual statements like “chemistry and biology are two different fields of study,” etc.
Anyway, for a recent debate on the issues, in which it’s clear that most evolutionists know little about evolution, feel free to see a rough transcript of an entire debate.
http://creationistsearcher.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/yomin-postelnik-debates-with-atheists
If you will be kind enough to point out the abrupt break between human and ape in these specimens. But be aware that different creationist websites draw the line in different places.
Nonsense. Typical fundamentalist nonsense not backed up by the facts.
This guy is a transitional. Note its position in the chart which follows (hint--in the right center):
Site: Koobi Fora (Upper KBS tuff, area 104), Lake Turkana, Kenya (4, 1)
Discovered By: B. Ngeneo, 1975 (1)
Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.75 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal, paleomagnetic & radiometric data (1, 4)
Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7), Homo erectus ergaster (25)
Gender: Female (species presumed to be sexually dimorphic) (1, 8)
Cranial Capacity: 850 cc (1, 3, 4)
Information: Tools found in same layer (8, 9). Found with KNM-ER 406 A. boisei (effectively eliminating single species hypothesis) (1)
Interpretation: Adult (based on cranial sutures, molar eruption and dental wear) (1)
See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=33
