Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 300winmag; g'nad; osagebowman; TalonDJ; HairOfTheDog; ecurbh; Corin Stormhands

Well... An interesting day. I find myself to be the proud owner of an M1 Garand. And a bunch of ammo in clips and a bandoleer.

There’s this old timer (”T”) at da waterin’ hole that I’ve known for years. Former Marine vet, maybe since the Spanish-American war. 900 years old. Parkinsons now. Gruff and snarlin’ old curmudgeon. Like I said... A swell guy. People love him to death. He’s an institution around here.

Well in a conversation some weeks back I’d said that someday I wanted an M1 in my inventory.

So T comes to me and wants to sell me his Garand. I express interest. Couple days later he really needs to sell, and like now. I know he’s got some some money issues. Price he wants is about avg for a good condition springfield. He’s no expert, heritage notwithstanding. And wasn’t really sure of the provenance of the rifle. Got it.

He had hocked it for the cash some weeks back. But went to pick it up and buy it back. They let him buy it back, but get this... Wouldn’t give it to him. They had to do an instant-check to “transfer” his own rifle back to him, and the ATF put a “3-day hold” on the transfer. Not sure what they would ultimately say. Apparently, T had some youthful indiscretions (again, circa the S-A war). His ability to recover the rifle (merely to sell to me anyway) was in doubt. But they could transfer it to me directly.
Well... Today we get together and go look at the rifle. Frankly... It was a little disappointing. It had a springfield barrel, in great shape, dated 1953 but it went downhill from there. A C.A.I. receiver, apparently unfired. The stock is Benelli, with Dutch markings, and fair condition at best. Looks like it spent a few minutes in a cement mixer. It was a well-used stock for sure. But no splits. Just dents.

So I was torn. It wasn’t the springfield M1 that I wanted, and the price was way too high. But its a shooter. It’ll work just fine, though I may have a gunsmith check it out before I fire it.

But I challenge anyone to look a man like T in eye, with his life story, and tell him he’s wrong, when his rent is due.

So I bought the rifle. And I feel good about it anyway.

Anyway. That was my day.


685 posted on 05/15/2008 9:41:15 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies ]


To: Ramius

That’s quite a story. I’m glad you bought the rifle. :~)


686 posted on 05/15/2008 9:44:09 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

Cool! Ya know, you need to come down to go shootin’ sometime.

I could use some practice with both the rifle and shotgun. Not simultaneously, of course.


687 posted on 05/15/2008 9:45:35 PM PDT by ecurbh (Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

You’re a good man, Ramius! And I’m glad you got your Garand!


690 posted on 05/15/2008 10:07:25 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius
You may have an interesting "project" rifle there. It sounds like a "parts" rifle made up with a new receiver. The challenge is to find the proper parts to bring it to its 1953 (date on the barrel) condition. Getting the correct vintage GI stock would be the biggest challenge.

There are lots of books on advanced Garand collecting out there. You won't increase its value, but you'd have the satisfaction of bringing an old warhorse back to a more historically accurate condition.

I have a Remington 1903 that seems to be a transition from the 03 to 03A3. It has all-milled parts, except for the trigger guard and follower, which are the crummy 03A3 type. (I actually shouldn't knock those stamped parts, even those are being counterfeited today). It still has the old ladder sight and handguard of the 03. And it must have seen some use, because it's quite well worn-in. I'm puzzled by those stamped parts, and have yet to do any research about it.

691 posted on 05/15/2008 10:18:35 PM PDT by 300winmag (Deterrence is an activity, destruction is a profession)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

yer a good man... yuh done right... IMHO...


696 posted on 05/16/2008 5:23:00 AM PDT by g'nad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

That one has History. Makes it much cooler.


697 posted on 05/16/2008 5:26:38 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

Yep...you done good.


708 posted on 05/16/2008 6:56:00 AM PDT by 2Jedismom (Expect me when you see me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

Great story and a good deal for your buddy. Something about those old M-1 Rifles, they are a classic. Now, to stock up that Lake City in clips and bandoleers. Just about the only time you can say clips. heh-heh. Once again, nice job Ramius.


816 posted on 05/16/2008 6:05:00 PM PDT by LSAggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson