[Boxen]

I’m not a professional debater(a “master” debater, if you will) or anything, but techinically, I think that might be what is called an ad hominem attack. You are attacking the manner of the arguer, not the argument itself.

[LS]

Not really. I'm attacking the fact that the supposedly most big-name "scientific" journal in the country is threatened by this film. Therefore, for it to provoke such rage, it must really be on target. If it was just silly, no one would pay any attention to its arguments.

And I'm not a professional debater either, but I think that's called "logic."