[[fact that your “god” acts in 1/0 parameters indicates that what you worship is not God]]
Now how do you get that from anything I’ve said?
[[And if I am wrong, I can accept being wrong — for all eternity if need be. If you’re wrong, can you accept it?]
What if I’m wrong? I’ve lsot nothing- IF there is no God- I lose absolutely nothing- but when we find out there is a God- I’ve gaiend eternity with Him for obeying His word
[[Let me make one more thing clear: I believe God exists. If you write again that I deny God exists, you are a liar]]
I said You deny God? Where? Yuo see? That’s your problem- you don’t follow conversations- I said IF you choose to deny God, then YOU are responsible for your decision, and that you can NOT place the blame on God. IF you are suggesting that God has many different ways of attaining Salvation, then you call Him a liar, and Christ died in vain-
[[On the contrary. I take responsibility for my actions and I intend to answer to God for them. I accept that.]]
Well now your story is changing- before you were suggestign that God must be psychotic because he laid down a path of salvation and will judge htose who refuse to beleive in Him, and you inferred that because God has such a demand, that He woudl be to blame for ‘sending us to hell to burn’, now you’re saying you will take responsibility? Which is it?
[[On the contrary. I may insult those who think they follow God. However, I do not, unlike you, malign or defame God as a simplistic creature,]]
Mind explaining how I malign God? This aught to be ripe with twisted logics- can’t wait- on pins and needles.
What if Im wrong? Ive lsot nothing- IF there is no God- I lose absolutely nothing- but when we find out there is a God- Ive gaiend eternity with Him for obeying His word
My question is what if you're wrong in that the way you portray God defames and maligns Him? Which is what I think you are doing.
I said You deny God? Where? Yuo see? Thats your problem- you dont follow conversations- I said IF you choose to deny God, then YOU are responsible for your decision, and that you can NOT place the blame on God.
You also wrote: "Lol- your whole argument against hte existence of God is based on your opinion that God must be and act in 1 0 parameters?" Which is inaccurate in two ways. In that I denied God existed. And that I believed God must act in 1/0 parameters -- which is what I said you believe.
Well now your story is changing- before you were suggestign that God must be psychotic because he laid down a path of salvation and will judge htose who refuse to beleive in Him, and you inferred that because God has such a demand, that He woudl be to blame for sending us to hell to burn, now youre saying you will take responsibility? Which is it?
I said your portrayal your god as a psychotic. God is not psychotic. Therefore, I do not believe what you worship is god.
If I'm wrong, I prepared to take responsibility. If you are wrong, are you prepared? Mind explaining how I malign God? This aught to be ripe with twisted logics- cant wait- on pins and needles.
I've already said how. The god you worship is a psychotic whose mode of thinking could not have produced that marvelous complexity that is this universe. If you really think that's God, then you malign God.
I suspect, however, that whether you realize it or not, you actually worship and serve God's adversary.