What if I’m wrong? I’ve lsot nothing- IF there is no God- I lose absolutely nothing- but when we find out there is a God- I’ve gaiend eternity with Him for obeying His word
My question is what if you're wrong in that the way you portray God defames and maligns Him? Which is what I think you are doing.
I said You deny God? Where? Yuo see? That’s your problem- you don’t follow conversations- I said IF you choose to deny God, then YOU are responsible for your decision, and that you can NOT place the blame on God.
You also wrote: "Lol- your whole argument against hte existence of God is based on your opinion that God must be and act in 1 0 parameters?" Which is inaccurate in two ways. In that I denied God existed. And that I believed God must act in 1/0 parameters -- which is what I said you believe.
Well now your story is changing- before you were suggestign that God must be psychotic because he laid down a path of salvation and will judge htose who refuse to beleive in Him, and you inferred that because God has such a demand, that He woudl be to blame for ‘sending us to hell to burn’, now you’re saying you will take responsibility? Which is it?
I said your portrayal your god as a psychotic. God is not psychotic. Therefore, I do not believe what you worship is god.
If I'm wrong, I prepared to take responsibility. If you are wrong, are you prepared? Mind explaining how I malign God? This aught to be ripe with twisted logics- can’t wait- on pins and needles.
I've already said how. The god you worship is a psychotic whose mode of thinking could not have produced that marvelous complexity that is this universe. If you really think that's God, then you malign God.
I suspect, however, that whether you realize it or not, you actually worship and serve God's adversary.
[[I said your portrayal your god as a psychotic. God is not psychotic.]
My portrayal is no such hting- you’ve intimated that I’ve doen somethign that was never my intention- My first example was a bit off, which I corrected- and as I said, the example was not perfect and hadn’t been fleshed out enough- but you apparently won’t allow that a mistake was made and later cleared up- your argument continues to be nothign gut petty ignorance of the clarifications.
[[I’ve already said how. The god you worship is a psychotic whose mode of thinking could not have produced that marvelous complexity that is this universe]]
You have explaiend absolutely nothign of the sort- You’ve not hsown how a God who sets down ‘either or’ rules is a psychitic God incapable of subtleties in other circumstances. Yuor accusation is shallow and ill thought out. As for hte reaminder of your post- I’m simply goign to ignore the ignorant accusation.