tribes » health & wellness » raw vegans » topics »
raw almonds now unhealthy: topic posted Fri, October 12, 2007 - 8:23 AM by Patti
On Friday, I blew the whistle on the FDA for allowing almond manufacturers to label pasteurized almonds as “raw.” It's unethical and illegal—and it's tragic that such a nutritious food would be nutritionally castrated by the powers-that-be.
But what I didn't tell you on Friday is that there are plenty of issues beyond the fact that almonds will no longer be a nutritional heavyweight — like the fact that consuming them could now pose a threat to your health.
The pasteurization method the FDA is recommending requires the use of propylene oxide. Let me tell you a little something about the chemical that's supposed to make almonds safer for you to eat.
For starters, it's a recognized carcinogen. A pollution information site called Scorecard says that propylene oxide is in the top 10 percent of compounds that are hazardous to human health and to the ecosystem. In six out of twelve ranking systems, it's ranked as one of the most hazardous chemicals.
It's suspected of causing birth defects, of altering your immune system, and of adversely affecting your central nervous system, your reproductive system, your respiratory system, and your gastrointestinal tract, liver, and gallbladder.
And incidentally, propylene oxide has been banned in Canada, Mexico, and the European Union.
So why on earth would the Almond Board of California suggest that such a change be made in the first place? Simple: to save face. In the last five years, there have been two outbreaks in some of their biggest almond operations in California. That can't be too good for business. But this new gig they've got going on won't be good for business either.
Eighty percent of the almonds grown worldwide are grown in the States, which means that a good chunk of change comes from exportation. The problem: Pasteurized almonds are not permitted in many overseas countries. Domestic sales are bound to take a nosedive as well, as companies are now turning to overseas sources to get raw almonds that are REALLY raw.
But perhaps the biggest hit will be taken by the smaller almond operations. Truth be told, even though all of the problems originated with the biggest almond industries, this little piece of legislation could spell the end of the line for organic and small-time almond operations. The minimum cost of the pasteurization equipment is $500,000 — a hefty price that not many smaller businesses can afford. Shipping the almonds off to be pasteurized has its own road bumps, not the least of which includes higher prices tied up in transportation costs.
This is an awful lot of fuss, especially considering the fact that nuts are not likely to pose a threat in and of themselves. It's when manure or other fecal matter gets transferred to the crops that contamination can occur. A better solution is one that would regulate the manmade carelessness that's the source of all these problem to begin with. But with today's Band-aid mentality, the likelihood of that happening is almost nil.
Nutty for the truth,
William Campbell Douglass II, M.D.
I wonder how many of these outbreaks come from the cheap labor used in the packing houses. A lot of them use illegals and those folks don't understand American hygiene principles. Or maybe they don't care, or worse. Someone in my raw foods group said they were able to buy almonds direct from the grower. As long as you buy less than 200 lbs, you're okay.
This has us in the crazy situation of importing raw almonds from Italy to the US! They grow perfectly good almonds down the street, within the city limits of Fresno, but we have to buy raw almonds from another country! Carrying coals to Newcastle??
10th <<<
It is that wonderful “one world order”, spread the wealth thing.
being as sarcastic as I can be.
Now we must buy almonds, on the local black market and it will soon be in the same class as raw milk.
granny