If you can’t post the actual calculations, I understand.
No, apparently you don't understand.
I could post the calculations but I choose NOT TO... it is obvious to me that it would be a waste of my time to post them for you.
I have no intention of copying pages of calculations and support data required to make them understandable because YOUR mis-characterization of the Square Cube Law shows you obviously lack the competency to critique them. Do you still maintain that the Square Cube Law only applies to "spheres or polyhedrons that can be approximated by spheres?"
When I have provided proof of the evidence, you just ignore it, anyway. So why should I bother to provide more?
I resent the implication you keep making that I am not competent to provide them.. when YOU have not responded to any challenge I have made... and it is you who have demonstrated incompetence on this thread.
You have provided no evidence at all... only your unsupported opinion... because you apparently want the facts to be something other than they are.
The weights and sizes are well established facts. If you think the entire paleontological community is WRONG on the sizes and weights they report on these large animals, then it is up to you to provide proof that they are wrong... not me.
Will you admit that the qualified scientists who did the research and wrote the peer-reviewed article on the Teratorn's flight capabilities did not produce "rubbish?"