The way someone explained it is that the majority of Hispanics voters in Virginia are not from Mexican descent where as in California, Arizona, and Texas most Hispanics are from Mexican descent and they are the one voting for Hillary Clinton 2:1 if not more.
That is true, but thanks to Dems there is a war going on between the Hispanics and African-Americans. The Ohio race will go Obama as the left has captured both demographics.
>> The way someone explained it is that the majority of Hispanics voters in Virginia are not from Mexican descent where as in California, Arizona, and Texas most Hispanics are from Mexican descent and they are the one voting for Hillary Clinton 2:1 if not more.
THE SCIENCE OF PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN POLITICS
1) Pundit makes hypothesis
2) “Experiment” (a.k.a. “election”) proves hypothesis wrong
— here we digress from REAL science —
3) Pundit SPINS results, grasping at straws to explain why hypothesis really WAS right even though the results contradicted the hypothesis
...hey, just like economics! Or MSNBC explaining why the market is down when it was up yesterday.
Crunching the data from my own observations, I obtain the following results:
2.3165% of “conventional wisdom” is accurate and the rest is pure unadulterated bovine excrement. I have not yet figured out which category any particular piece of C.W. falls into.
I’m gonna trust my gut, thanks.
>> The way someone explained it is that the majority of Hispanics voters in Virginia are not from Mexican descent where as in California, Arizona, and Texas most Hispanics are from Mexican descent and they are the one voting for Hillary Clinton 2:1 if not more.
THE SCIENCE OF PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN POLITICS
1) Pundit makes hypothesis
2) “Experiment” (a.k.a. “election”) proves hypothesis wrong
— here we digress from REAL science —
3) Pundit SPINS results, grasping at straws to explain why hypothesis really WAS right even though the results contradicted the hypothesis
...hey, just like economics! Or MSNBC explaining why the market is down when it was up yesterday.
Crunching the data from my own observations, I obtain the following results:
2.3165% of “conventional wisdom” is accurate and the rest is pure unadulterated bovine excrement. I have not yet figured out which category any particular piece of C.W. falls into.
I’m gonna trust my gut, thanks.
Does that mean two votes per mexican, or two votes per ballot?