[Caipirabob]

No. The low wall was a chance that zoo officials took. We can only be thankful that no other people were killed by their negligence.

That is what the punk's attorney is going to present as an argument.

And that is how he is going to pay off his new Mercedes.

Right or wrong, the general objective of visiting a zoo is not to be eaten/attacked.

The zoo did put the public at risk. They might counter sue or appeal, but it's quite possible, with a tiger that has already attacked a human being, that any random innocent could have been a victim.

[Mr. Brightside]

I think everyone’s attitude would be a lot different around here if the tiger escaped and killed a blond haired, blue eyed 8 year old girl named McCallister and mauled two fair-skinned 10 year old brothers named Stevenson.