Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: lilycicero
Could be of interest. Or perhaps not.
29 posted on
01/03/2008 11:27:52 AM PST by
RedRover
(DefendOurMarines.com)
To: najida
30 posted on
01/03/2008 11:27:56 AM PST by
tioga
(Happy New Year!)
To: ShadowDancer
The plaintiff, who is a married graduate student in elementary educationJust saw the video. I don't believe her, of course. My guess is either her husband threw a fit when he saw the commercial, or she realized it might damage her career prospects as an elementary school teacher.
To: ShadowDancer
At least it doesn’t make her look fat.
36 posted on
01/03/2008 11:31:51 AM PST by
Duke Nukum
(He burns at the center of time and he sees the turn of the Universe.)
To: ShadowDancer
If a man gave me a diamond necklace——
I’d hop up out of bed and look out the window for four skeletons on horses. Come to think of it, Nostradamus predicted it!
37 posted on
01/03/2008 11:32:29 AM PST by
najida
(Every tried to explain to Alltel that the cockatoo ate your cell phone?)
To: ShadowDancer
Unless the release she signed was written by the worst lawyer in the world, she is SOL.
38 posted on
01/03/2008 11:32:46 AM PST by
joebuck
To: ShadowDancer
When Harry Met Sally --> diner scene circa 1989
Meg Ryan was better... yawn
40 posted on
01/03/2008 11:33:23 AM PST by
xtinct
(I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
To: ShadowDancer
Fake lawsuit. Publicity stunt by a company with a .com name.
It’s just scam by (Company Name).com to get their name and web address out there, and to get people to find a model rubbing herself to get onto YouTube and generate free advertising.
41 posted on
01/03/2008 11:34:03 AM PST by
VirginiaConstitutionalist
(The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of the Individual against the State.)
To: ShadowDancer
Clearly a clerical mix up. When they mailed out the job descriptions they got the addresses reversed and sent the model the one for ‘nun’, and visa versa. Somewhere in America today, there’s a very happy nun.
To: ShadowDancer
A model who says she has worked hard to maintain a wholesome imageOh yeah, I can tell from her gyrations on the bed in the ad that she was duped.
To: ShadowDancer
To: ShadowDancer
Ah, light dawns on marble head. From the full article: [emphasis added]
The plaintiff, who is a married graduate student in elementary education
No doubt she had no qualms during filming but after the ad was played, a classmate or teacher advised her that her chosen career was in deep, deep jeopardy.
46 posted on
01/03/2008 11:41:15 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
To: ShadowDancer
"I OD'd on that jewelry"
47 posted on
01/03/2008 11:41:52 AM PST by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: ShadowDancer
The 37-year-old woman claims in her lawsuit that she did not "consent to or authorize the use of her likeness, picture, image or name to simulate a female having an orgasm or otherwise experiencing sexual pleasure." Then why did she tape the video?
49 posted on
01/03/2008 12:13:49 PM PST by
VRWCmember
(Fred Thompson 2008! Taking America Back for Conservatives!)
To: ShadowDancer
If she didn't intend for her to act as though she was having an orgasm, I'd certainly like to know just what it was that she was doing on the tape.
"I'll have whatever she's having!"
Mark
52 posted on
01/06/2008 8:37:38 PM PST by
MarkL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
