Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Model Sues Jewelry Company, Saying Ad Makes Her Look Lewd
FoxNews.com ^ | January 3, 2008 | AP

Posted on 01/03/2008 11:13:22 AM PST by ShadowDancer

Model Sues Jewelry Company, Saying Ad Makes Her Look Lewd

Thursday, January 03, 2008

NEW YORK — A model who says she has worked hard to maintain a wholesome image has filed a $5 million lawsuit complaining that a jewelry company's video advertisement in which she writhes and moans looks pornographic.

The commercial, seen on the Internet in a clip entitled "Rock Her World," shows a woman wearing blue lacy lingerie and a diamond necklace while moaning and stroking her face and neck. It ends with the Web address for the jewelry company, Szul.com.

Click here to see the ad on YouTube.

The 37-year-old woman claims in her lawsuit that she did not "consent to or authorize the use of her likeness, picture, image or name to simulate a female having an orgasm or otherwise experiencing sexual pleasure."

"Indeed, the music to the commercial is bump-and-grind burlesque type music, which further provides the advertisement with a decidedly pornographic look, feel and sound," states the lawsuit, which was filed Monday in Manhattan's state Supreme Court.

The plaintiff, identified only as Jane Doe, says in court papers she won the role in the commercial for Szul Jewelry Inc. in November. She says the idea was that an average guy would get a woman excited by putting a necklace on her.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 01/03/2008 11:13:26 AM PST by ShadowDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
she did not "consent to or authorize the use of her likeness, picture, image or name to simulate a female having an orgasm or otherwise experiencing sexual pleasure."

Sounds like the standard pre-nup to me.

2 posted on 01/03/2008 11:14:51 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

This could be a fantastic ploy to get the ad ten time the number of views it would get otherwise.


3 posted on 01/03/2008 11:15:51 AM PST by linear (We must act now to conserve the Earth's precious supply of momentum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

“I’ll have what she’s having.”


4 posted on 01/03/2008 11:15:57 AM PST by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
saying Ad Makes Her Look Lewd

Yeah, usually rolling around a bed moaning and touching yourself in lingerie will do that to a person. Go figure.

5 posted on 01/03/2008 11:16:21 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

later view.


6 posted on 01/03/2008 11:16:38 AM PST by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

I kinda think she made herself look like a ho, but thats just me.


7 posted on 01/03/2008 11:16:40 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
So the writhing around in front of the camera wasn't meant to be displayed as sexual pleasure? Yeah, right. Did she think it was an exercise video?
8 posted on 01/03/2008 11:17:04 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Government is the hired help - not the boss. When politicians forget that they must be fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linear

BINGO!


9 posted on 01/03/2008 11:17:07 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
...she did not "consent to or authorize the use of her likeness, picture, image or name to simulate a female having an orgasm or otherwise experiencing sexual pleasure.

Sounds like the standard pre-nup to me.

Several thousand married guys just smiled at that.

10 posted on 01/03/2008 11:18:32 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
She says the idea was that an average guy would get a woman excited by putting a necklace on her.

Works for me.

11 posted on 01/03/2008 11:19:15 AM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linear

OMG, it’s the Huckabee Maneuver!!!!
;-)


12 posted on 01/03/2008 11:20:17 AM PST by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud RUSH REPUBLICAN! WIN, FRED, WIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

What a bimbo....surely she was paid, surely she signed a release form, surely if she had any issues she would have raised them before donning lingerie and acting like a whore. Surely this is a nuisance law suit and surely, I hope she loses and any money she was paid for “modeling” goes straight into her ambulance chasing attorney’s pocket.


13 posted on 01/03/2008 11:20:47 AM PST by Alright_on_the_LeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

bttt


14 posted on 01/03/2008 11:21:29 AM PST by JamesP81 ("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
She says the idea was that an average guy would get a woman excited by putting a necklace on her.

It works better than picking fleas and lice from her back. Male Monkeys 'Pay' Females for Sex, Study Finds.

15 posted on 01/03/2008 11:21:33 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Government is the hired help - not the boss. When politicians forget that they must be fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
After that scene, the court papers say, the director told her to fake excitement while lying down, without smiling.

"He asked her to keep repeating the action until he thought he got the most authentic looking film piece," they say.

MMMmmm-K. Just what *did* she thing she was filming when asked to lay down and "fake excitement"? If this is not her idea of an orgasm then I'd say she has a great opportunity in front of her.

16 posted on 01/03/2008 11:22:30 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Jay Grodner stands accused of keying a Marine's car. He's also a lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

This thread is worthless without pics....


17 posted on 01/03/2008 11:23:12 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (Don't trust anyone who can’t take a joke. [Congressman BillyBob])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

Wasn’t the time to think about how it would appear when she was performing for the camera? Well, she wasn’t hired for her brains.


18 posted on 01/03/2008 11:23:42 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

Call me crazy, but wasn’t she paying attention during the filming? If she had objections, she could have chosen not to do the ad. Bogus lawsuit.


19 posted on 01/03/2008 11:24:17 AM PST by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
So the writhing around in front of the camera wasn't meant to be displayed as sexual pleasure? Yeah, right. Did she think it was an exercise video?

Hence the likely reason this is just a marketing ploy.

20 posted on 01/03/2008 11:24:49 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson