So, basically the idiots who think this is a valid counter-argument are ceding the argument that ID should be taught in science class, but insist on having a theological debate about the Designer's nature and form in that same class.
Funny, that.
33 posted on 12/13/2007 1:14:10 PM PST by Buggman
(HebrewRoot.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
So, basically the idiots who think this is a valid counter-argument are ceding the argument that ID should be taught in science class, but insist on having a theological debate about the Designer's nature and form in that same class. Funny, that.
Let's see all your research PROVING that the FSM didn't create everything. I want to see it. In a bowl. With alfredo sauce.