Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JustaDumbBlonde

You’re right. I watched some of “Dog”’s interview on Hannity and Colmes and kept thinking I was looking at one of those “it can’t happen here” dramas. Is anyone really surprised that a bounty hunter who calls himself Dog uses inappropriate language on occasion? This was a private conversation and hardly a “racist rant,” as even sympathetic commentators keep saying. It was the desperate plea of a guy who knows he’s being set up by someone and can’t bring himself to see that the culprit is his own son.

Is the use of an objectionable word IN PRIVATE really worse than setting up your own parent for public humiliation and the loss of his livelihood?

Why isn’t the son being dragooned to come before the cameras and apologize?


16 posted on 11/10/2007 6:29:35 AM PST by joylyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: joylyn
A small point on your comments: Dog has not lost his livelihood ... he has only lost the bucks that go along with taping and televising his antics. The bail bond business existed before the bounty hunter show and will continue after the show.

I have no idea why the little jerk of a son is not being held accountable for his actions, other than the media probably doesn't want to be viewed as attacking the "victims" of Dog's transgressions. Also, liberals (the media included) love it when parents are made to look like the bad guy. Liberals encourage all children to tattle on their parental units.

17 posted on 11/10/2007 6:50:37 AM PST by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson