I think in the deposition, Howard said at the time of the 6% agreement, the three were working together....but as it stands, Khavarian wouldn't get a cut.
Glad you got an answer on that - yeah, the will was July 30, 2001 - Khavarian’s first suspension was just 2 days later - August 1, 2001. He was suspended most of the next 2.5 years and finally disbarred in March 2004.
~~~~
Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law
Effective Date Description Case Number Resulting Status
Disciplinary and Related Actions
3/20/2004 Disbarment 03-N-1071 Disbarred
9/14/2003 Ordered inactive 03-N-1071 Not Eligible To Practice Law
7/31/2003 Ordered inactive 03-N-1071 Not Eligible To Practice Law
6/22/2003 Discipline w/actual suspension 02-O-11765 Not Eligible To Practice Law
2/5/2003 Discipline w/actual suspension 02-PM-11217 Not Eligible To Practice Law
10/11/2002 Ordered inactive 02-PM-11217 Not Eligible To Practice Law
9/19/2002 Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 99-O-13254 Not Eligible To Practice Law
8/30/2002 Ordered inactive 02-O-11765 Not Eligible To Practice Law
8/1/2001 Discipline w/actual suspension 99-O-13254 Not Eligible To Practice Law
Administrative Actions
9/16/2002 Suspended, failed to pay Bar membr. fees Not Eligible To Practice Law
~~~~
>>I have no idea what the date of the “Stern Rale Khavarian” 6% agreement might have been. I’ve been trying to find a logical point for making an educated guess, from looking at all the proceedings, but I just can’t - since we have no idea what part these guys played in any of it, other than Stern saying he was the atty for “entertainment contracts” and doesn’t give any concrete examples.
ANS’s actual Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization itself was discharged on March 25, 1999, effective as of March 8, 1999. So many cross-claims and counter-claims took place after that, under the same case pleading, that I don’t know up from down.
With all the “awards” of multi-million dollars and all the attendant overturnings and appeals of those awards, I’m not sure how in the world those debts could’ve been discharged!
I’m still looking for the judgment document that actually lists the debtor claims and how they were settled. That’s where HKS “says” this epheremous document shows up publicly. I don’t have Pacer or Lexis-Nexis, so can’t browse to find it.
I *believe* I have a partial list in among the Texas probate papers, but it’s not fully detailed. I remember the attorney claims in the 100s of 1000s, like 350-400.
Anyway, I can’t take much more time on looking until after I’m finished updating the Case Name List for Monday! Aarrgh!
it was smart of McCabe to leave the door open for addl depo time - i think we can be sure Virgie is very interested in any agreements her daughter may have made as to timing of those agreements
i still think it’s very fishy that only a few months after Nygard broke off intimate relations with Vicki, she’s sitting in a lawyer’s office with lawyers Nygard knew nothing about when he had been associated with Vicki both intimately and professionally for two years prior
also interesting that howie baby claims intimacy with Vicki, from the time the nygard romance ended, thru the time she was with Mark Hatten.
one would think, if she was intimate with howie from 2000 2002, she wouldn’t have spent the six months after Mark was run off ‘on the couch depressed for six months’
ok, if Khavarian’s license was suspended, therefore making him incapable legally of authoring/drafting a will, that would set him up for further malpractice charges, yes?