What we have is ... If you think of it as a family of bacteria. 80% figure addresses the entire family of Acinetobacters.
On the other report: CDC stat 1.3 is addressing only one strain in a large family (child if you will) of all Acinetobacters. CDC’s stat 1.3 specificly addresses only the A. baumannii (children in the Acinetobacter family) while the other is giving stats for the entire family aka all strains. Two different things really. 1.3 a.b. only does not equal 80% of all acinetobacters in other words.
80 % of infections acquired in hospitals / clinical are Acinetobacter. They don’t break it down into the stain aka child. All strains of Acnetobacter is in this figure not just the baumannii strain.
CDC’s report is speaking directly of a. baumannii in it’s 1.3 percent of ALL blood infections acquired in a clincal environment. Staph is a blood infection etc but not included in the 1.3 nor are the many other strains of Acinetobacter.
A.B is the most ‘hardy’ therefore most problematic. CDC is only considering A.B. in the 1.3 percent. It is not including ALL other strains of Acinetobacter in the figure so 80% (family) does not equal the 1.3 (children only).
Clearly most / all infections are NOT acquired in a clincal enviroment. We would be one dead society if 80% of all infections were found in hospitals. So in other words of most infections are not acquired in a hosptial but of those that are, acinetobacter accounts for 80% of them say vs a staph or strep infection etc.
Good news is - We now know it is the integrons to be responsible for the resistance. This puts new meds on the horizon.
Bottom line in Anna’s case is still.. these pathogens are easily found on testing. None could be found past Perper’s so called test / lab. Mr I know everything and will be the lab, the ME and the cop guy is full of it. None could be duplicated or proven out of all FOUR of his maybe maybe maybe maybe ... = NOT!
And that is when he took the culture directly from the material in the cyst! “cultures, however, failed to grow either of these micro-organisms”! “no endotoxins were found in the blood”!
What is curiously tucked away and hushed even hidden in his report and he never addressed in his autopsy is that other cultures yielded strep and staph!!! Old lumpy sure never talked about those did he! Why in the H would a ME exclude these? We know he listed everything else he claims was negative or positive. But no where, nothing addressing some of the most well known infections are in an autopsy of someone that had a friggin fever???!!! Perper is a disgusting excuse for a human being let alone a so called professional.
I have no problem deducing that hks and ke’s deadly meals of pharmaceuticals is what killed Anna. But Perper’s deceit is astounding! I have to ask myself WHY? Why is he so vested in all the lies?
Is it possible that he leaned so heavily on KE’s double-speak he lost his way and has been back-pedalling?
KE either: #1 knew exactly what kind of exotic bacteria culture was injected into the buttocks. or #2 did no lab to determine what infection was causing the fever. or #3 made no effort to cure the infection. or #4 there was no infection, no fever and the ice-baths were a cover for something else.