Here’s a link to another summary and his technical paper mentioned in his original post:
Summary:
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/5181/
Technical paper:
http://www.creationontheweb.com/images/journal_of_creation/vol21/5181creationist.pdf
Do you seriously believe this stuff?
Summary:
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/5181/
Technical paper:
http://www.creationontheweb.com/images/journal_of_creation/vol21/5181creationist.pdf
That's what I like.
Technical scientific papers published, not in technical scientific journals, but on creationist websites.
That sure engenders a lot of confidence!
If you have real science, you can get it published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. If you have creation "science" you are limited to creationist websites.