[Coyoteman]

Here’s a link to another summary and his technical paper mentioned in his original post:

Summary:

http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/5181/

Technical paper:

http://www.creationontheweb.com/images/journal_of_creation/vol21/5181creationist.pdf

That's what I like.

Technical scientific papers published, not in technical scientific journals, but on creationist websites.

That sure engenders a lot of confidence!

If you have real science, you can get it published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. If you have creation "science" you are limited to creationist websites.

[GodGunsGuts]

It’s quite the opposite, Coyoteman. The real science of interpreting the data occurs on Creationist and ID websites...unlike the mindless gathering of information that passes for science at Darwin approved institutions.