To: brityank; Forest Keeper; swatbuznik; Potts Mtn. Pappy; Kevmo; wastedyears; dragonblustar; ...
2 posted on
08/13/2007 4:34:46 PM PDT by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: KevinDavis
Enough already. If life came here on a rock, then how did it get ON the rock. They can go backwards in origination theories only so far. At some point, something had to put it on the rock.
3 posted on
08/13/2007 4:52:13 PM PDT by
laweeks
To: KevinDavis
4 posted on
08/13/2007 6:55:09 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: KevinDavis
5 posted on
08/13/2007 6:59:50 PM PDT by
Dysart
To: KevinDavis
Even if the “life” form they use could survive the entry into Earth’s atomosphere, I question its survival of riding in space for anytime subjected to all the radiation, etc.
6 posted on
08/13/2007 8:15:07 PM PDT by
Lawgvr1955
(You can never have too much cowbell !!)
To: 75thOVI; AFPhys; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; ...
There has been one of these I think, but anyway...
7 posted on
08/13/2007 9:16:20 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Saturday, August 11, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: KevinDavis
Sort of a cruddy title to be expected from New Scientist. A more accurate one would be: Fiery Rock to Test Whether Life Could Have Come from Space.
8 posted on
08/14/2007 1:19:27 AM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
