If you believe in the creation story of Genesis, why do you need to wait around for evolution to be disproved? Is there a chance it wasn't created by a God?
Your conviction against Darwin seems a lot more modest compared to the other creationists on FR.
Actually, I am a very strong believer in Creation by the God of the Bible. I don't believe it because of the Genesis account alone. In fact if there was only the Genesis account on which to base a belief in Creation, it would be difficult to accept. It is the proven reliability of a vast amount of the Bible that can be out confirmed by the historical record that convinces me that there is a Creator and that the Creator is the God of the Bible.
I do not get bogged down in arguments about the young Earth controversy. Creation does not mean it was a literal six days as humans understand it, but it doesn mean it wasn't. After all, God is God.
My point is that, for a purely logical view point, if evolution is disproved, and it has been, then Creation is the only rational alternative given the evidence available.
I don't think Behe has ruled out creation, but he has ruled out Darwinian evolution. It would not surprise me if he believed in creation, but he doesn't have to establish that to disprove Darwinian evolution.