If “plenty of biologists disagree” with Behe should refute be able to refute the evidence. Problem is the advances in science are doing exactly the opposite of what they expected. Rather than confirming evolution, they are confirming that macroevolution simply cannot be supported by the evidence.
What’s his alternative theory?
You are aware that Behe accepts descent with modification and natural selection?
Those are “trivial” and “modest” notions, according to Dr. Behe.
What he does not accept is random mutation: “By far the most critical aspect of Darwin’s multifaceted theory is the role of random mutation. Almost all of what is novel and important in Darwinian thought is concentrated in this third concept.”
Maybe the IDers need to get together and figure out if the designer is the invisible pink unicorn, the spaghetti monster, bugs from Mars, or the invisible friend in the sky.