[HOTTIEBOY]

“My professional opinion is that she is being treated too rough, given the severity of her offenses”

Youre right. They have gone out of their way to make sure it doesn’t look like they are giving her favorable treatment.

[HitmanLV]

Yes, I agree. That’s easy to see with anybody with clarity.

[agent_delta]

“My professional opinion is that she is being treated too rough, given the severity of her offenses”

Youre right. They have gone out of their way to make sure it doesn’t look like they are giving her favorable treatment. I disagree.

California DUI Law..
SECOND OFFENSE:

Two options, both carrying a fine of $390 to $1000, plus either:

(A) 10 days to 1 year in jail and an 18-month license suspension;

or

(B) 48 hours to 1 year in jail, an 18-month or 30-month alcohol/drug program, and a license restriction allowing driving only for work and alcohol/drug program for the duration of the program.
However, license shall be suspended for 18 months if the offense occurred in a vehicle which requires a class 1, 2, A, or B license.
Installation of interlocking device for 18 months.

The judge is not "being too rough" on her. He is within the law - and is punishing her for her disregard for the law.

Hopefully, this will be a wake-up call to her - and maybe the rest of the "WE ARE ABOVE THE LAW" Hollywood types.

/soapbox