Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Okay, work on it from a different end - develop it as a propulsion system for NASA - a “fast” bus to Mars or the Moon.
It not like NASA doesn’t have have plenty of money..


12 posted on 05/09/2007 9:32:18 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: if his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray
“Okay, work on it from a different end - develop it as a propulsion system for NASA - a “fast” bus to Mars or the Moon.
It not like NASA doesn’t have have plenty of money..”

You could also approach it from a weapon’s perspective if you figured out a way to open up a hole in the reaction chamber and create a directed energy “beam” or some such through the hole. THAT would be a mighty powerful weapon.... AND it would be extremely efficient.

I suspect close to a 1 to 1 ration of energy created to destructive power (focused and directed). You could literally vaporize a target with a millisecond energy burst.

19 posted on 05/09/2007 9:44:05 AM PDT by roaddog727 (BullS##t does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

Or, he could say that he is doing research into Global Warming. Then he would be snowed under by the amount of money he’d get.


37 posted on 05/09/2007 3:41:58 PM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson