To: presidio9
I saw the original article in the Bay City paper. These trees were snapped off high (10 ft.?) above the ground, and they were young green trees, not old and brittle.
7 posted on
04/10/2007 6:39:19 AM PDT by
PCBMan
(Go Team Venture!)
To: PCBMan; corlorde
I saw the original article in the Bay City paper. These trees were snapped off high (10 ft.?) above the ground, and they were young green trees, not old and brittle.That changes everything. Of course I am now convinced that nothing other than Bigfoot could have done this.
Damn UPI and their incomplete reporting...
8 posted on
04/10/2007 6:40:50 AM PDT by
presidio9
(Suspended for posting an article about Scalia and Arthur Miller arguing at SCOTUS. Seriously.)
To: PCBMan; presidio9
I saw the original article in the Bay City paper. These trees were snapped off high (10 ft.?) above the ground, and they were young green trees, not old and brittle.Ten feet? Case closed, Bigfoot it is. I was in the woods not too long ago, and I saw broken branches at around 20 feet, my first thought was Godzilla, or perhaps Mothra was flying low and building nests.
10 posted on
04/10/2007 6:45:53 AM PDT by
corlorde
(New Hampshire)
To: PCBMan
...they were young green trees, not old and brittle.
Yeh, but in Bay City, Michigan, they were, in all probability, young green frozen trees. Water is considerably less pliable when it turns to ice.
13 posted on
04/10/2007 6:48:51 AM PDT by
elli1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson