Thanks for the clarification; I totally agree with everything you said.
I am gobsmacked by Perper’s decisions. I just don’t get it. How he didn’t question anything.
Perper did explain himself somewhat...by saying it wasn’t like a truamatic blow...He said he could never prove it...but with a little police work...I think they could. It would be a circumstantial case but many murderers have been convicted on circumstantial evidence.