Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sodpoodle
They were sure hunting for a clue as to what sources (witnesses) O'Quinn knew of. Had NOTHING to do with the deposition at hand.

O'Quinn is very good. Basically, he said "I ain't telling you sh** so get on your mule and get outa town.

What we know ABSOLUTELY now is that Virgie's son is supporting her in every way she can and that she is STILL O'Quinn's client.

14,985 posted on 08/23/2007 4:48:44 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14979 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau
I googled "Larry Birkhead" under news by date. He told US that Dannielynn loves to watch her mother's films. Somebody wondered if this shouldn't be reported to Child Protective Services.

(AMA has emphasized that no children under two should watch TV. This has to do with brain development and hyperactive behavior)

14,987 posted on 08/23/2007 4:53:02 PM PDT by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14985 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau; sodpoodle
Thanks for the ping, Sod. It's been a hectic couple of weeks, but I found time last night to scan part of the deposition, and finished it tonight. I didn't read it word for word, but enough to form an opinion.

Sac, with your experience with lawyers, do they all ask long-winded and confusingly-worded questions? I found some of Lin Wood's questions to be almost incoherent...am I wrong? I know he asked the same questions over and over after they were answered the first time. I think he was trying to trip up O'Quinn. I understand that a person is presumed 'innocent until proved guilty', but when there's been no indepth or thorough investigation into the death of ANS and Daniel, then why can't a person have their own opinion? Someone could say, "HKS had nothing to do with the death/murder of the two victims"; but, why can they get by with a positive comment without any evidence or proof that they are correct? There is more circumstantial evidence indicating the opposite is true, but we won't know until someone decides to investigate.

On page 194 of the deposition, O'Quinn's friend and fellow lawyer is preparing to leave the room and this exchange followed. Please tell me if I am wrong, but didn't Lin Wood sound like a smarta$$ when he interrupted their conversation with this comment:

THE WITNESS: Where you going to be?

8 MR. PIRTLE: I'm going to be around.

9 THE WITNESS: Then I'll call you.

10 MR. WOOD: He can't e-mail you, 11 because --

12 MR. KLEIN: We know that.

13 MR. WOOD: -- I just saw you waive 14 the BlackBerry.

15 MR. PIRTLE: I'll be in the 16 building.

17 THE WITNESS: I'll find you. 18 (Mr. Pirtle left the deposition 19 room.)

O'Quinn had told LW that he was "computer ignorant", and I thought LW had no business inserting himself into their conversation with that 'cutsie-pie' comment. I thought he was implying he didn't believe O'Quinn when he said he knew nothing about computers.

14,989 posted on 08/23/2007 6:03:34 PM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14985 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Good.


14,995 posted on 08/23/2007 6:53:55 PM PDT by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14985 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson