Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: baysider; kcw2007

“Dannielynn’s only asset is her right to inherit from the Estate of her
mother, which is belng administered by this court. Dannielynn has no other
absets.”

what the hay? I thought Dannielynn had a cool 1.7 million from the OK shoot, as well as other proceeds from contracts signed the week of Anna’s funeral??? plus the ‘trust fund’ that HK supposedly set up??? plus the ‘trust fund’ that Milstein is executor of??? so how the hay do they get, ‘no other assets’ out of that?


11,224 posted on 05/15/2007 12:32:16 AM PDT by blueplum ([IC - ICE -(ice bath)])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11214 | View Replies ]


To: blueplum; All
just noticed Amendment 10:

ATTACHMENT 1O All other relatives, including the minors grandparents. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 1511(c)(2), because the petition is for the appointment of a guardian of the estate only..........the court may dispense with the giving of notice to any one or more or all of the relatives. As set forth in the Court Rules of the Los Angeles Superior Court, GUARDIANSHIPS, Section 10.157 APPOINTMENT OF GENERAL GUARDIANS, "a petition for appointment of a guardian of the estate which requests the appointment of the natural parent or parents may be approved ex parte." This petition requests appointnent of the minor's natural father as the guardian of the estate only.

compare that, to the previous page 9, comment #4:

Petitioner Larry E. Btrkhead is the childs natural father and caregiver, and has sole custody of the child, Dannielynn. As the child's father and caregiver, Petitioner is in the best position to protect and safeguard the interests of the chlld as guardian of her [DL's] estate, including her interests in the Estate of her deceased mother.

is this saying two different things?

11,225 posted on 05/15/2007 12:49:24 AM PDT by blueplum ([IC - ICE -(ice bath)])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11224 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum; All
re: Anna’s will submission to probate - page 39 of 44 (after reading that HK is asking to be appointed executor) and relating to the request for a ‘special administrator’ ....”However, On March 30, 2007, the Ninth Circuit panel stayed action on all the motions ‘pending resolution of (1)the identity and appearance of the necessary parties...and (2) appearance of counsel of such parties...”

does this mean, that HK was in court pursuing the Marshall action as early as March 30th? would the Ninth Court arbitrarily take this action independently??

11,227 posted on 05/15/2007 3:14:12 AM PDT by blueplum ([IC - ICE -(ice bath)])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson