Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SengirV

I don't understand why it is so out of fashion for these stars to adopt American children. We have plenty needing homes.


5 posted on 03/27/2007 8:47:16 AM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SmoothTalker

A blue-eyed white baby doesn't make near the social statement that a baby from the Third-World does. Especially if it's a little on the scrawny side.


8 posted on 03/27/2007 8:50:46 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (Hajjis HATE the waterboard! It can turn a clam into a canary so fast Harry Potter would be jealous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker
I don't understand why it is so out of fashion for these stars to adopt American children. We have plenty needing homes.

Try it sometime. It's a nightmare

9 posted on 03/27/2007 8:53:25 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker

I understand and agree with your point, but would offer the following.

The conditions for children up for adoption in America are far superior to the conditions faced by children up for adoption in third world countries.

I'm not suggesting that American kids up for adoption have it good, or are living high on the hog, but there is no comparison between the conditions in the U.S. and in the majority of the rest of the world.

Even kids in the former Soviet states have it immensely worse than orphans here in America.


14 posted on 03/27/2007 8:56:31 AM PDT by Deut28 (Cursed be he who perverts the justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker

"I don't understand why it is so out of fashion for these stars to adopt American children. We have plenty needing homes."

Not really.

It's next to impossible to adopt a non-special-needs kid domestically.

Moreover:

First, costs about $50K. It's a big racket.

Second, you wait 2+ years.

Third, and most importantly, "open adoption" is the rage here in the USA. That is, birth momma and birth daddy (if around) know the adoptive parents' names and have visits with "their" child you effectively babysit. They show up, ask for money, demand money, and, as the adopted child gets older, start asking him or her for money, shelter --- etc. Heck, after you've raised them, they all but try to take the child you raised from you.

Fourth, adoptions in the USA unravel legally with a distirbing reglarity. Take care of a child for 7 years, then daddy gets out of prison --- claims he never knew about the child --- and demands "his" kid back. Foreign adoptions are generally much more final in this regard, if by nothing else, the distances involved.


19 posted on 03/27/2007 9:07:58 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker
The problem is the social welfare system in the US. That movie star's newest child's birth mother doesn't have a prayer of getting her kid back - she'll just make for some sensational headlines for the trash media for a few months.

In the states, you can love a child in foster care for 3 years only to be forced to return him/her to a bad situation because the birth mother got out of prison.

For the record, there are not plenty of babies who are available for adoption. What we have got is plenty of older boys available only after they've been scarred by abusive, drug addled birth families for years on end.

25 posted on 03/27/2007 9:29:08 AM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SmoothTalker
I don't understand why it is so out of fashion for these stars to adopt American children. We have plenty needing homes.

Disclaimer: I am not now, and will never, be standing up for Hollywood stars. LOL.

The reason many people wanting to adopt choose an overseas adoption is the few but potent examples of sick judiciary in this country. Judges have taken 4-year-old children away from their only parents (the adoptive parents) because some SHMUCK shows up and tests as the bio-father (sperm donor) and was never told his climax back in '02 made a child. It's such an atrocious occurrence that it's not worth the risk to the child.

34 posted on 03/27/2007 10:22:19 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson