Seidlin was brilliant. He lay traps throughout the proceedings; I kept saying "gotcha" to myself. He drew each one in and smacked them down in a gentle, unsuspecting way. That is justice!
Judges usually have researchers. I can picture him saying: Tell me everything you got....and it was an A-Z layout. He picked what he perceived as the most important elements to concentrate. It had to drive the attorneys wild because they're used to "DIRECTING" the judges perception.
I thought Seidlin was brilliant...he was no dummy...he got more info....that might possibility be used by the investigators....remember Stern didn't have time to prep himself for the questions...they were off the cuff. Seidlin was awesome!
""""""""""Seidlin was brilliant. He laid traps throughout the proceedings; I kept saying "gotcha" to myself. He drew each one in and smacked them down in a gentle, unsuspecting way. That is justice!"""""""""
Sara - I want so badly for you to be correct in your assessment. Have to confess, I could not stand to watch all of it. Seidlin's silly, whimsical, drama-queen behavior was such a turn-off. He managed to get HK$ on the stand which was great - but then, it seeemed to me, he let Barth run the courtroom.
Please let my impressions be wrong and yours right. I wanna believe;) It's all I have;)