Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lizarde
He was going to try to "back date" the marriage privilege?? Like he wouldn't be able to testify against Anna in the death of Daniel...and visa versa??

So, at this upcoming inquest, he's going to use this marriage as a refusal to testify against Anna?? Isn't he nice!!!

7,939 posted on 03/22/2007 6:18:02 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7936 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

Yeah sweet move on that idea.

Howiever what about statues of Limitations on the "ceremony"by Bahama Law?

Like I murder your kid and Marry you hurry up style to avoid the husband/wife no testimony thingy.

The alleged murder/mystery death took place prior to the man/woman marraige ceremony.

Heck if it were that easy we would see the marraige ceremonies increasing big time here in the US.


8,018 posted on 03/22/2007 8:35:10 AM PDT by Global2010 ( I am the worst armchair slueth in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7939 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Do we know that applies in the Bahamas?


8,060 posted on 03/22/2007 9:13:48 AM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7939 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

I don't think so. He knew and knows the commitment ceremony wasn't a legal marriage. He was just trying to explain why they didn't do the legal thing at the time. He knows there is no marital privilege regarding testifying at Daniel's inquest, even if they DID get legally married. He was not sure of it at the time of the commitment ceremony and did not want people to say they got married, legally, just to avoid testifying at Daniel's inquest.


8,177 posted on 03/22/2007 12:04:37 PM PDT by tabor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7939 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson