Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kcw2007

Good point. The will was discussed in the trial and on several TV programs with lawyers discussing it. They all seemed to come to the same conclusion that it was a very unusual will...especially the part that said, "I have intentially omitted to provide for my spouse and other heirs, including future spouses and children......

Perhaps you remember when the judge asked Howard if he read the will when it was written, he said, "No."


5,405 posted on 03/19/2007 8:58:38 AM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5374 | View Replies ]


To: toldyou
Perhaps you remember when the judge asked Howard if he read the will when it was written, he said, "No."

Didn't he say "Not all of it,no"?

5,408 posted on 03/19/2007 9:02:35 AM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5405 | View Replies ]

To: toldyou
"No, I read it on the day it was signed". They usually have a date on the top....the date it was written. Then, at the end, there are party, witness signatures, notary etc. with dates attached to each.

Written and signed are two different dates in the majority of cases.

5,409 posted on 03/19/2007 9:07:40 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson