Good point. The will was discussed in the trial and on several TV programs with lawyers discussing it. They all seemed to come to the same conclusion that it was a very unusual will...especially the part that said, "I have intentially omitted to provide for my spouse and other heirs, including future spouses and children......
Perhaps you remember when the judge asked Howard if he read the will when it was written, he said, "No."
Didn't he say "Not all of it,no"?
Written and signed are two different dates in the majority of cases.