[Sacajaweau]

I write a statement on my work that: It can be used for this purpose "and no more". It amounts to "destruction" after used for that purpose.

BUT, since there was a previous order for the DNA and going to the Bahamas can be seen as "flight" and the DNA actually becomes part of a database, I think the Ca courts have first rights to it. I sure hope so.

As far as only blood is valid? We're back to Shakespeare..."A pound of flesh but not one drop of blood".

"CRACKER" "What CRACKER is this same that deafes our ears with this abundance of superluous fluff"....William Shakespeare in King John 1595.

Damn, I think I may even have the video of this.

[uncitizen]

since there was a previous order for the DNA and going to the Bahamas can be seen as "flight" and the DNA actually becomes part of a database, I think the Ca courts have first rights to it. I sure hope so.

I hope so too.

Wow i'm impressed with your Shakespearean knowledge. I've got the complete works on the shelf but could never understand that stuff. It's like poetry. I never get that either. I'm better at picking out metaphors in movies than in those in writing. Altho, i did understand the ones you quoted.